- Why Tim O’Reilly is fighting SOPA.
- A follow-up to the illin’-whack controversy, Mike D of the Beastie Boys weighs in on The Colbert Report (much hilarity ensues).
- Don’t forget to RSVP for The Nerdery’s Agile webinar coming up Tuesday, January 17 & Thursday, January 19.
- We’ve all had our cell phones go off at inopportune times, but nothing is as bad as when it happened at the New York Philharmonic on Tuesday.
- What’s up with the weather?
- Star Trek vs StarWars: Which is better?
- Attention Design Nerds! PBS has posted the Charles & Ray Eames documentary.
- Why JRR Tolkien never won a Nobel prize.
- Ending an endless game: an interview with Julian Gough, author of Minecraft’s epic finale.
- Forecasting next week’s Apple education event.
- Lifehacker has the best tech-friendly airports and airlines.
- World’s most stunning beauty product: Fotoshop by Adobe.
- The magic & madness of the creative process.
Tag Archives: lexicography
Gawker has posted a great exchange between a vigilant New York Times crossword solver and the venerable crossword editor, Will Shortz. The awesomeness that ensues revolves around the word “illin” and its actual definition. The email back and forth includes this smack down:
According to the Dictionary of American Slang, edited by Robert L. Chapman, “illin’” means “stupid, insane.” “Wack” is defined as “worthless, stupid.”
The Dictionary of Contemporary Slang, by Tony Thorne, defines “illin’” as “bad, uncool,” and says it is a buzzword in the rap and hip-hop cultures. It seems to me that’s roughly the same as “wack” in the sense of worthless or stupid.
Go on over to Gawker to see the crossword solver continues her argument for the proper use of illin’.